Absolutely shameful.
the video clip "Motorist Violence at Berkeley Critical Mass (May 11, 2007)"
vwww.youtube.com/watch reveals several obvious things.
Not only did this crowd make some senior citizens terrified, but actually PUT their bikes in the path of the van to "make a point" then the "victims" who sooo emotionally played their "victim" roles, videotaped themselves calling these scared senior citizens "crazy" and "violent" and doing everything in their power to make this an emotionally charged event that they could then take advantage of in the press, and in public opinion. most shameful of all is the mans shameless and cruel pimping of his OWN CRYING TODDLERS to further pump up as much emotion as he possible could. this man and "parents" like him are no better than the sick evangelicals who brainwash and use kids for right-wing christian fodder.
I am a child of such shameless "leftist" movements, and find these people to be false, shameless, empty pretenders to the calling of "activist" I myself have been cut off, insulted, cursed at and challenged by "critical mass" people in my car, (though I ride my bike about 70% of the time) and seen their sociopathic behavior first hand, several times.
Word: you in critical mass and all other phony, self serving, ego driven organizations who desperately need to been seen as "victims" and as "revolutionaries" are all outdated, and have hijacked the left and destroyed solidarity among leftists with your special interest, ego-driven hyperemotional, opportunist public displays of political ignorance.
This was not what we fought and bled for as children.
You, are pretenders.
Signed,
Piero Amadeo Infante.
Son of the east bay.
Bring it on.
You are not leftist, nor do you represent anything other than your own Egos.
the video clip "Motorist Violence at Berkeley Critical Mass (May 11, 2007)"
vwww.youtube.com/watch reveals several obvious things.
Not only did this crowd make some senior citizens terrified, but actually PUT their bikes in the path of the van to "make a point" then the "victims" who sooo emotionally played their "victim" roles, videotaped themselves calling these scared senior citizens "crazy" and "violent" and doing everything in their power to make this an emotionally charged event that they could then take advantage of in the press, and in public opinion. most shameful of all is the mans shameless and cruel pimping of his OWN CRYING TODDLERS to further pump up as much emotion as he possible could. this man and "parents" like him are no better than the sick evangelicals who brainwash and use kids for right-wing christian fodder.
I am a child of such shameless "leftist" movements, and find these people to be false, shameless, empty pretenders to the calling of "activist" I myself have been cut off, insulted, cursed at and challenged by "critical mass" people in my car, (though I ride my bike about 70% of the time) and seen their sociopathic behavior first hand, several times.
Word: you in critical mass and all other phony, self serving, ego driven organizations who desperately need to been seen as "victims" and as "revolutionaries" are all outdated, and have hijacked the left and destroyed solidarity among leftists with your special interest, ego-driven hyperemotional, opportunist public displays of political ignorance.
This was not what we fought and bled for as children.
You, are pretenders.
Signed,
Piero Amadeo Infante.
Son of the east bay.
Bring it on.
You are not leftist, nor do you represent anything other than your own Egos.
posted by:
|
|
Unsubscribed |
-
Unsu...
Re: Open Letter to Critical Mass
Sun, May 20, 2007 - 6:12 PMSilence all around.
Funny for such an outspoken group. it speaks volumes that no one here has even replied. volumes.
more to follow. -
-
Re: Open Letter to Critical Mass
Mon, May 21, 2007 - 3:05 PMBefore you troll this group, do yourself a favor and research the situation beyond just looking at the u tube video and what you read on KTVU.
there's already too much baiting and flaming around this and the other related incidents all over the innerweb. -
-
a reasoned repsonse to Piero, the King of Trolls.
Mon, May 21, 2007 - 3:16 PMI highly doubt someone would put their beloved fixie - one that they spend $4-500 for a set of new Deep V rims with sealed bearing hubs and other personal and custom add ons.
Cyclists don't do shit like that- even to make a point.
Would it seem reasonable to put a babystroller in front of a speeding car, or a wheelchair? why do automatically think the 3 or 4 cyclists willingly threw their bikes under the car and sacrificed their rides?
Are you that stupid to believe what you see on the tee vee?
I suppose the 880collapse was a terrorist training exercise by a depraved drug dealing ex con as well?
-
-
Unsu...
Re: a reasoned repsonse to Piero, the King of Trolls.
Mon, May 21, 2007 - 5:28 PMthat was a "response"?
no. I think it was a joke. perhaps unintended, nonetheless, a joke.
These people created a villain, and INVOLVED CHILDREN, the involvement of those crying kids alone is enough to expose them, and "defenders" (you must first begin with something defendable)
no. I've seen way more than just that youtube video, and after 30 years in the "movement" I think I can pretty much tell a pretender, or group of pretenders when I see one.
signs:
the first sign of "leftist" or "green" phonies and their sociopathic behavior, is making themselves out to be the "victim" in every encounter without taking ANY responsibility whatsoever, and the second, is attempting to pose themselves as proletariat, while they are in fact, close to the heart of the very source of imperial power and all it's problems.
they can dress up all they want in leftist clothing. no matter. they are rich, white, ego-driven, self-victimizing, and they terrorize elderly people and kids.
I guess your all ok with that.
Fine with me. -
-
Unsu...
Piero, the King of Trolls.
Mon, May 21, 2007 - 5:33 PMIn a kingdom which seems ruled by self-deluded liars intent in maintaining their openly racist, imperialist, culture-vulture, two faced, cowardly status quo, while living at the bosom of capitalism, I take being called that by you, a great, no, vast, honor.
I thank you.
you may continue exposing yourself at will. -
-
Re: Piero, the King of Trolls.
Mon, May 21, 2007 - 7:07 PMmy plan has worked brilliantly. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Piero, the King of Trolls.
Mon, May 21, 2007 - 9:36 PMso has mine. as you will soon see. -
-
Re: Piero, the King of Trolls.
Wed, May 23, 2007 - 1:46 AMAhaha, you are hilarious.
Hey guys, never defend yourself if you're being run over by an automobile, because this guy has "plans" for us.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Open Letter to Critical Mass
Wed, May 23, 2007 - 2:05 AMNice CL posting, by the way, "son of the east bay." -
-
An actual reply:
Wed, May 23, 2007 - 3:18 AM[first posted in the Berkeley tribe]
As someone who was present at the last Berkeley Critical Mass ride and witnessed the situation at hand, I'd just like to point out two things:
1. No matter what "types of people" ride in CM, no matter the age of the motorist, it is inexcusable to knowingly and intentionally drive your vehicle into human beings. The driver of that minivan injured people and got away with it. Please keep in mind while watching the video that this is the panicked reaction of people who were just assaulted by a vehicle weighing a thousand pounds more than all of them put together. People pounded on the minivan.. After its wheels injured them or their friends and ruined their only methods of transportation to work, school, home, etc. Property damage and bodily harm, to me, are very far apart from each other.
What would you have done in a situation like that? Odds are, you would have freaked out and screamed at the driver to back off. Please, try to put yourselves in the positions of the cyclists and then ask if anything they did was out-of-line. You could answer "yes" to that, but until you have been there, you really don't know.
2. Someone mentioned that the police don't ticket people on bicycles often. I have found this to be incredibly untrue. In my experience, the BPD has shown its personal bias against bicyclists. My first experience was when, while riding with a friend of mine, he fell after hitting a pothole and a police officer noticed and came rushing over. I thought he was going to see if my friend was okay, but instead he took his ID, asked him where he lived and if he'd ever been arrested before, if he had any warrants, etc.. Just for falling off of his bicycle!
And my most recent experience supporting my opinion of the BPD bias against bicycles is how they handled the situation being discussed here. They refused to take statements from us. I wanted to give a statement and the police officers on the scene just ignored me. Another person, who had a pruning saw pulled on him by the motorist [also mentioned in the press, including in the motorist's words] asked to make a statement with the police and was denied the right to do so. I was standing with the woman who you can see in the video with her foot stuck in between the wheel of the van and her pedal, practically begging the police to let us or at least her press charges. They were giving us a lot of "I'll come back in two minutes and talk to you," or "You need to talk to Officer Waite, not me," until finally [From Officer Waite]"You've already been spoken to." And they got into their cars and drove away.
Later, while speaking to the press, the police stated that no cyclists came forward to press charges.
--
I just wanted to share some facts with you guys. My first hand experiences regarding the event as a witness. I was terrified by the incident and it's very upsetting to see people make us out to be an "angry mob." If I am less than inches away from being under the wheels of a vehicle and many people, some who I don't even know, come to my rescue, I'd be very thankfully.. Whether people who don't know much about what happened consider those people an "angry mob" or not.
I was there. I know what happened.
Either believe me or don't. I just wanted to share a piece of my experience with you so maybe you could think about it.
One more thing that I want to mention is that there was no video of the incident before what you're all seeing. This has been mentioned elsewhere several times, but I think someone asked about it here. The person filming the ride did not have his camera on at the time the vehicle accelerated into the intersection and struck cyclists, but was able to turn his camera on a few seconds after that and that is what you're watching.
If this was a "staged event," don't you think we would have been ready for it? -
-
Unsu...
Re: An actual reply:
Wed, May 23, 2007 - 10:03 AMI stand correct on CM being a "spontanous ride" rather than an organization.
Perhaps you should MAKE it an organization. at least then people can be held accountable for their actions on the street.
Any group that does spontanous actions without knowing it's own membership, or the people involved runs the risk of being a mob, and not a "group"
I am glad we are openly talking about what i think is a very important subject and I appreciate your candor.
however, unlike amy I don't think you very credible at all. this is not meant to be a parsonal attack. you may very well be a ultra credible person. I am addressing only your words here and their tone.
you miss my point entirely and I see you totally sidestep the spiritual and political content of my critique.
you make no mention of the children being abused. yes. abused. un;less the only offenses here that count are the ones that insult you personally.
You make not mention of the man who ripped off a windshield wiper and then in a clearly two-faced display of event staging, went and got the kids.
NO. there is no excuse for the people who act inhumanely. not the elderly, nor any of you. it would appear that you hold one standard for yourself, and another entirely different for anyone who falls on the wrong side of a confrontation with CM.
I have background here. I have studied politically incendary groups, cult psych, political manipulations, zealots, and the legal process for around 30 years.
Staged events do not have to be planned. you have only to look at the bush administration's shameful use of hurricaine Katrina to see this in action. like those examples the incident was a staged event based on happenstance. I also have two other people telling me another side of the story entirely.
you stated: "it is inexcusable to knowingly and intentionally drive your vehicle into human beings"
Your argument would be strengthened of you appeared care the slightest bit about the toddlers, who are pimped and abused in this exchange by someone who has two faces. you show the same self-victimizing and emotionally based thinking as the crowd did that day. which is, the you were the innocent victims of an evil old man. I didn't see that at all.
after studying riot footage, war footage, political debates, street violence, assassination footage, and endless reels, clips, and photos for longer than you have been alive, and also having been invloved in leftist politics for 30 years, I think I can spot bullshit and manipulation when witness it.
threats? what threats? this is another example of melodramatic self-serving and self victimizing behavior. not to mention being a perfect example of exactly the kind of issue manipulation I am addresing
so: what I get so far:
1: only offenses against CM count, and offenses against anyone else, no mattter what the situation, including children who are little more than infants, on the part of people who are publicly and openly acting in a dishonest way, are perfectly fine.
If this is so, than your movement is doomed. seriously. no real progressive movement has ever survived such a blatant contradiction in it's own claimed values. All are now only reminants or ruins of their previous incarnations.
Look. I am a leftist. born one and will die one. some people in my family died for that, and died for your right to protest in the relative safety of berkeley. we were maligned, lied about in the press, attacked, spied on by Edgar Hoover (look up the word COINTELPRO) and many of my family did extensive prison sentences for your right to assemble. so yes. I have a big time reason for questioning your motives, and your methods.
as much as I would love to agree with the statement "being white has nothing to do with it" the statement smacks of the same denial of class and color that my parents had to combat just to remain together in the 50's and 60's. it smacks of the same privillege and the same "I am above it all" mentality that caused the radical movements in Berkeley and Oakland to be stirred to action in the first place. Denial is not a pretty sight coming from a so-called "progressive". race always matters, as does class. your attempt to sidestep this critical issue reveals yet more cracks in youur position.
OK. bottom line? ths may suprise you. I believe you. I believe you saw what you saw, and that it affected you they way it did.
I also believe you are being manipulated knowingly or unknowingly, that you have lost a god deal of critical thinking in this exchange, and that you, just like so many examples I have seen before, are acting out of mob psych.
what I find interesting, is not only your apparant inability to address the children issue, and why people would feel the need to lie about the incident. this does not speak well. about the van hitting one of the bicyclists? I am convinced that this did happen. that he crunched through severall bikes with no provocation? please. grow up.
I have ridden my bike for 25 years and never had anything bad happen. why is it that so many CM goes that confrontation and violence occurs?
your entire argument is stdestepping critical points, and showing that the only people you care about (and this includes children) are yourselves.
Luckily, you are not the sole representative for CM.
I do not mean to insult you. seriously. but your logic is flawed, your motives questionable, and your tone promethean.
I think people who think like you may be a part of CM's growing image problem.
There it is. please address some of these issues? or not. it is becoming apparant that a lot of CM'ers only sees what they want to see. -
-
Re: An actual reply:
Wed, May 23, 2007 - 12:31 PMCM will congeal into an 'Organization' as soon as the morning and evening commutes are 'organized', with leadership and a clear route to and from the office(s). until then, we are 'free to assemble'. -
-
Re: An actual reply:
Wed, May 23, 2007 - 5:18 PMI'm not sure what axe our newcomer is grinding, but it obviously has to do with a lot more than CM, or even cycling.... -
-
Re: An actual reply:
Thu, May 24, 2007 - 1:25 AMHere is a narrated video of parts of the incident along with a few interviews. Maybe this will clear some things up: www.youtube.com/watch
-
-
-
-
-
